Cytactic vs Kela Cyber
Cytactic vs Kela Cyber, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cytactic is on 56/100 and Kela Cyber on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Cytactic
- headcount growth: +68.5% against +17.1%
Kela Cyber
- domain rating: 69/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 155 against 56
- funding raised: $75.0M against $16.0M
- LinkedIn following: 14,405 against 8,624
At a glance
| Measure | Cytactic | Kela Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyber crisis management and readiness for enterprises and governments. | Award-winning cybercrime threat intelligence firm providing actionable intelligence on underground cybercrime threats. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Consulting, Risk Management | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Homeland Security, Fraud Prevention |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2G |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cytactic | Kela Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 56 | 155 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +68.5% | +17.1% |
| Total funding | $16.0M | $75.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,624 | 14,405 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cytactic | Kela Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cytactic | Kela Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Cytactic | Kela Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“KELA Cyber Threat Intelligence | Black Basta Leak: New Findings Reveal Victim Details. Last week, we issued a new report on Black Basta’s leak exposing their inner workings.”r/SecurityIntelligence
Cytactic vs Kela Cyber: common questions
Which is better, Cytactic or Kela Cyber?
On our 0-100 score Kela Cyber rates higher (58/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cytactic and Kela Cyber compare on the numbers?
Cytactic leads on headcount growth (+68.5% against +17.1%). Kela Cyber leads on domain rating (69/100 against 26/100), headcount (155 against 56), funding raised ($75.0M against $16.0M), LinkedIn following (14,405 against 8,624).
What do real users say about Cytactic and Kela Cyber?
Kela Cyber: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/SecurityIntelligence.
Read the full Cytactic review and pricing or the Kela Cyber review and pricing. You can also browse other Cytactic alternatives we track.