CYREBRO vs Hunters AI
CYREBRO vs Hunters AI, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CYREBRO is on 61/100 and Hunters AI on 70/100.
Where each one leads
CYREBRO
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Hunters AI
- our overall score: 70/100 against 61/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 180 against 143
- funding raised: $118M against $66.0M
- LinkedIn following: 25,421 against 10,583
At a glance
| Measure | CYREBRO | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CYREBRO provides a managed detection and response (MDR) solution, offering a full-fledged Security Operations Center (SOC) to organizations. | AI-powered SOC platform automating threat detection, investigation, and response for security teams. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Managed Detection and Response | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CYREBRO | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 143 | 180 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -15.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $66.0M | $118M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,583 | 25,421 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CYREBRO | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CYREBRO | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
CYREBRO vs Hunters AI: common questions
Which is better, CYREBRO or Hunters AI?
On our 0-100 score Hunters AI rates higher (70/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CYREBRO and Hunters AI compare on the numbers?
Hunters AI leads on our overall score (70/100 against 61/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 37/100), domain rating (61/100 against 50/100), headcount (180 against 143), funding raised ($118M against $66.0M), LinkedIn following (25,421 against 10,583).
Read the full CYREBRO review and pricing or the Hunters AI review and pricing. You can also browse other CYREBRO alternatives we track.

