CYREBRO vs Exabeam
CYREBRO vs Exabeam, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CYREBRO is on 61/100 and Exabeam on 69/100.
Where each one leads
CYREBRO
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 61/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 794 against 143
- headcount growth: +2.8% against -15.9%
- funding raised: $390M against $66.0M
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 10,583
At a glance
| Measure | CYREBRO | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CYREBRO provides a managed detection and response (MDR) solution, offering a full-fledged Security Operations Center (SOC) to organizations. | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Managed Detection and Response | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Foster City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CYREBRO | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 143 | 794 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -15.9% | +2.8% |
| Total funding | $66.0M | $390M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,583 | 51,918 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CYREBRO | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CYREBRO | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Matomo |
| Open source | No | Yes |
CYREBRO vs Exabeam: common questions
Which is better, CYREBRO or Exabeam?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CYREBRO and Exabeam compare on the numbers?
Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 61/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 37/100), domain rating (76/100 against 50/100), headcount (794 against 143), headcount growth (+2.8% against -15.9%), funding raised ($390M against $66.0M), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 10,583).
Read the full CYREBRO review and pricing or the Exabeam review and pricing. You can also browse other CYREBRO alternatives we track.