Cyolo vs Twingate
Cyolo vs Twingate, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyolo is on 57/100 and Twingate on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Cyolo
- funding raised: $85.2M against $62.0M
- LinkedIn following: 13,106 against 6,806
Twingate
- our overall score: 61/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 57/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cyolo | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Secure remote privileged access for operational technology and cyber-physical systems. | Twingate provides a Zero Trust Network Access solution that replaces traditional VPNs for secure remote access. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Privileged Access Management (PAM), Operational Technology (OT) Security | Cybersecurity, Zero Trust, Network Access, Remote Access |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Ramat Gan, Israel | Redwood City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyolo | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 77 | 84 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +10.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $85.2M | $62.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $400M |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,106 | 6,806 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyolo | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyolo | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cyolo vs Twingate: common questions
Which is better, Cyolo or Twingate?
On our 0-100 score Twingate rates higher (61/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyolo and Twingate compare on the numbers?
Cyolo leads on funding raised ($85.2M against $62.0M), LinkedIn following (13,106 against 6,806). Twingate leads on our overall score (61/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 50/100), domain rating (73/100 against 57/100).
Read the full Cyolo review and pricing or the Twingate review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyolo alternatives we track.