Cyolo vs Okta
Cyolo vs Okta, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyolo is on 57/100 and Okta on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Cyolo
- headcount: 77 against 3
Okta
- our overall score: 70/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 57/100
- funding raised: $187M against $85.2M
At a glance
| Measure | Cyolo | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Secure remote privileged access for operational technology and cyber-physical systems. | Cloud-based identity and access management platform for secure user authentication and application access. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Privileged Access Management (PAM), Operational Technology (OT) Security | SaaS, Cybersecurity, Cloud, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Ramat Gan, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyolo | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 77 | 3 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +10.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $85.2M | $187M |
| Latest round | Series B | IPO |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,106 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyolo | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 90/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyolo | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cyolo vs Okta: common questions
Which is better, Cyolo or Okta?
On our 0-100 score Okta rates higher (70/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyolo and Okta compare on the numbers?
Cyolo leads on headcount (77 against 3). Okta leads on our overall score (70/100 against 57/100), domain rating (90/100 against 57/100), funding raised ($187M against $85.2M).
Read the full Cyolo review and pricing or the Okta review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyolo alternatives we track.