Cyolo vs Netskope
Cyolo vs Netskope, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyolo is on 57/100 and Netskope on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Cyolo
- our overall score: 57/100 against 52/100
Netskope
- domain rating: 79/100 against 57/100
- funding raised: $1.5B against $85.2M
- LinkedIn following: 225,415 against 13,106
At a glance
| Measure | Cyolo | Netskope |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Secure remote privileged access for operational technology and cyber-physical systems. | Netskope provides a leading security service edge (SSE) platform that unifies security and networking to protect data and users everywhere. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Privileged Access Management (PAM), Operational Technology (OT) Security | Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Data Security, Network Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Ramat Gan, Israel | Santa Clara, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyolo | Netskope |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 77 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +10.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $85.2M | $1.5B |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $8 |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,106 | 225,415 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyolo | Netskope |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 20/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyolo | Netskope |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cyolo vs Netskope: common questions
Which is better, Cyolo or Netskope?
On our 0-100 score Cyolo rates higher (57/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyolo and Netskope compare on the numbers?
Cyolo leads on our overall score (57/100 against 52/100). Netskope leads on domain rating (79/100 against 57/100), funding raised ($1.5B against $85.2M), LinkedIn following (225,415 against 13,106).
Read the full Cyolo review and pricing or the Netskope review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyolo alternatives we track.