Cynamics vs Shield-IoT
Cynamics vs Shield-IoT, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cynamics is on 55/100 and Shield-IoT on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Cynamics
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 29/100
- LinkedIn following: 3,687 against 1,223
Shield-IoT
- domain rating: 30/100 against 24/100
- headcount growth: -9.7% against -14.2%
- funding raised: $11.0M against $7.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Cynamics | Shield-IoT |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Next-generation Network Detection and Response (NDR) solution for threat prediction and visibility. | Cybersecurity and analytics for mass-scale B2B IoT and IIoT networks. |
| Category | Smart City, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Network Security | Smart City, Cybersecurity, Automotive, Industry 4.0 |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cynamics | Shield-IoT |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 13 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -14.2% | -9.7% |
| Total funding | $7.0M | $11.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,687 | 1,223 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cynamics | Shield-IoT |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (29/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 24/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cynamics | Shield-IoT |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Self Managed |
| CMS | Wix | WordPress |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Cynamics vs Shield-IoT: common questions
Which is better, Cynamics or Shield-IoT?
On our 0-100 score Cynamics rates higher (55/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cynamics and Shield-IoT compare on the numbers?
Cynamics leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 29/100), LinkedIn following (3,687 against 1,223). Shield-IoT leads on domain rating (30/100 against 24/100), headcount growth (-9.7% against -14.2%), funding raised ($11.0M against $7.0M).
Read the full Cynamics review and pricing or the Shield-IoT review and pricing. You can also browse other Cynamics alternatives we track.