Cylus vs Field Effect
Cylus vs Field Effect, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cylus is on 61/100 and Field Effect on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Cylus
- our overall score: 61/100 against 49/100
- LinkedIn following: 11,241 against 6,696
Field Effect
- domain rating: 66/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 150 against 48
At a glance
| Measure | Cylus | Field Effect |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity platform for operational rail technology systems, ensuring service availability and safety. | Cybersecurity platform for operational technology (OT) and industrial control systems. |
| Category | Locomotive, Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, Rail Tech | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, OT Security, ICS Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Ottawa, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cylus | Field Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 48 | 150 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -4.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $53.7M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $30.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 11,241 | 6,696 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cylus | Field Effect |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cylus | Field Effect |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot, Freshdesk |
Cylus vs Field Effect: common questions
Which is better, Cylus or Field Effect?
On our 0-100 score Cylus rates higher (61/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cylus and Field Effect compare on the numbers?
Cylus leads on our overall score (61/100 against 49/100), LinkedIn following (11,241 against 6,696). Field Effect leads on domain rating (66/100 against 41/100), headcount (150 against 48).
Read the full Cylus review and pricing or the Field Effect review and pricing. You can also browse other Cylus alternatives we track.