Cylib vs TripleW
Cylib vs TripleW, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cylib is on 61/100 and TripleW on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Cylib
- our overall score: 61/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 129 against 27
- funding raised: $66.6M against $16.5M
- LinkedIn following: 17,840 against 4,708
TripleW
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cylib | TripleW |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Revolutionizing battery recycling for a circular future in Europe. | Upcycles food waste into high-value lactic acid using climate-transformative technology. |
| Category | Battery Recycling, Circular Economy, Deep Tech, Materials Science | Life Sciences, Food Waste, Food, Climate Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2022 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Germany, Germany | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cylib | TripleW |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 129 | 27 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +2.5% |
| Total funding | $66.6M | $16.5M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,840 | 4,708 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cylib | TripleW |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cylib | TripleW |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
Cylib vs TripleW: common questions
Which is better, Cylib or TripleW?
On our 0-100 score Cylib rates higher (61/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cylib and TripleW compare on the numbers?
Cylib leads on our overall score (61/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 31/100), domain rating (46/100 against 31/100), headcount (129 against 27), funding raised ($66.6M against $16.5M), LinkedIn following (17,840 against 4,708).
Read the full Cylib review and pricing or the TripleW review and pricing. You can also browse other Cylib alternatives we track.