Cylib vs Stormfisher
Cylib vs Stormfisher, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cylib is on 61/100 and Stormfisher on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Cylib
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 129 against 53
- LinkedIn following: 17,840 against 9,514
Stormfisher
- funding raised: $430M against $66.6M
At a glance
| Measure | Cylib | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Revolutionizing battery recycling for a circular future in Europe. | Develops, owns, and operates industrial-scale facilities producing green hydrogen derived e-Fuels. |
| Category | Battery Recycling, Circular Economy, Deep Tech, Materials Science | Climate Tech, Clean Energy, Green Hydrogen, Hydrogen |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2022 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Germany, Germany | London, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cylib | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 129 | 53 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +46.9% |
| Total funding | $66.6M | $430M |
| Latest round | Series A | PE Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,840 | 9,514 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cylib | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cylib | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Cylib vs Stormfisher: common questions
Which is better, Cylib or Stormfisher?
On our 0-100 score Stormfisher rates higher (62/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cylib and Stormfisher compare on the numbers?
Cylib leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 33/100), domain rating (46/100 against 34/100), headcount (129 against 53), LinkedIn following (17,840 against 9,514). Stormfisher leads on funding raised ($430M against $66.6M).
Read the full Cylib review and pricing or the Stormfisher review and pricing. You can also browse other Cylib alternatives we track.