Cylib vs Re-Fresh Global
Cylib vs Re-Fresh Global, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cylib is on 61/100 and Re-Fresh Global on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Cylib
- our overall score: 61/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 129 against 12
- funding raised: $66.6M against $1.2M
- LinkedIn following: 17,840 against 3,847
Re-Fresh Global
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cylib | Re-Fresh Global |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Revolutionizing battery recycling for a circular future in Europe. | Transforms textile waste into new raw materials using groundbreaking technology. |
| Category | Battery Recycling, Circular Economy, Deep Tech, Materials Science | Circular Economy, Industrial, Textile, Textile Recycling |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Technology |
| Founded | 2022 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Germany, Germany | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cylib | Re-Fresh Global |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 129 | 12 |
| Total funding | $66.6M | $1.2M |
| Latest round | Series A | Pre-Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,840 | 3,847 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cylib | Re-Fresh Global |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 42/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cylib | Re-Fresh Global |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Cylib vs Re-Fresh Global: common questions
Which is better, Cylib or Re-Fresh Global?
On our 0-100 score Cylib rates higher (61/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cylib and Re-Fresh Global compare on the numbers?
Cylib leads on our overall score (61/100 against 46/100), domain rating (46/100 against 27/100), headcount (129 against 12), funding raised ($66.6M against $1.2M), LinkedIn following (17,840 against 3,847).
Read the full Cylib review and pricing or the Re-Fresh Global review and pricing. You can also browse other Cylib alternatives we track.