Cylib vs Mater.ai
Cylib vs Mater.ai, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cylib is on 61/100 and Mater.ai on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Cylib
- our overall score: 61/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 13/100
- funding raised: $66.6M against $3.1M
Mater.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cylib | Mater.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Revolutionizing battery recycling for a circular future in Europe. | AI-driven materials discovery platform for next-generation thermoelectric materials. |
| Category | Battery Recycling, Circular Economy, Deep Tech, Materials Science | Advanced Materials, AI, Climate Tech, Energy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Germany, Germany | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cylib | Mater.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 129 | Not published |
| Total funding | $66.6M | $3.1M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,840 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cylib | Mater.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 8/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 13/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cylib | Mater.ai |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Framer |
Cylib vs Mater.ai: common questions
Which is better, Cylib or Mater.ai?
On our 0-100 score Cylib rates higher (61/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cylib and Mater.ai compare on the numbers?
Cylib leads on our overall score (61/100 against 54/100), domain rating (46/100 against 13/100), funding raised ($66.6M against $3.1M).
Read the full Cylib review and pricing or the Mater.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Cylib alternatives we track.