Cylib vs geCKo Materials
Cylib vs geCKo Materials, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cylib is on 61/100 and geCKo Materials on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Cylib
- our overall score: 61/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 129 against 15
- LinkedIn following: 17,840 against 1,399
geCKo Materials
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 45/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cylib | geCKo Materials |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Revolutionizing battery recycling for a circular future in Europe. | Developing advanced materials for a sustainable future. |
| Category | Battery Recycling, Circular Economy, Deep Tech, Materials Science | Materials, Sustainability, Deep Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Hardware |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Germany, Germany | Cambridge, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cylib | geCKo Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 129 | 15 |
| Total funding | $66.6M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,840 | 1,399 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cylib | geCKo Materials |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 20/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cylib | geCKo Materials |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Wix |
Cylib vs geCKo Materials: common questions
Which is better, Cylib or geCKo Materials?
On our 0-100 score Cylib rates higher (61/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cylib and geCKo Materials compare on the numbers?
Cylib leads on our overall score (61/100 against 53/100), domain rating (46/100 against 20/100), headcount (129 against 15), LinkedIn following (17,840 against 1,399). geCKo Materials leads on agent readiness (56/100 against 45/100).
Read the full Cylib review and pricing or the geCKo Materials review and pricing. You can also browse other Cylib alternatives we track.