Cylib vs Fast Metals
Cylib vs Fast Metals, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cylib is on 61/100 and Fast Metals on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Cylib
- our overall score: 61/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 33/100
- funding raised: $66.6M against $4.3M
Fast Metals
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cylib | Fast Metals |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Revolutionizing battery recycling for a circular future in Europe. | Extracting critical minerals from industrial waste like red mud using a proprietary chemical process. |
| Category | Battery Recycling, Circular Economy, Deep Tech, Materials Science | Climate Tech, Materials Science, Mining, Waste Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2022 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Germany, Germany | Stamford, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cylib | Fast Metals |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 129 | Not published |
| Total funding | $66.6M | $4.3M |
| Latest round | Series A | Pre-Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,840 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cylib | Fast Metals |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 33/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 52/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 33/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cylib | Fast Metals |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
Cylib vs Fast Metals: common questions
Which is better, Cylib or Fast Metals?
On our 0-100 score Cylib rates higher (61/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cylib and Fast Metals compare on the numbers?
Cylib leads on our overall score (61/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 30/100), domain rating (46/100 against 33/100), funding raised ($66.6M against $4.3M).
Read the full Cylib review and pricing or the Fast Metals review and pricing. You can also browse other Cylib alternatives we track.