Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) vs Puck
Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) vs Puck, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) is on 66/100 and Puck on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry)
- our overall score: 66/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 10/100
- headcount: 2,013 against 74
Puck
- agent readiness: 74/100 against 41/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered endpoint security solutions that proactively prevent threats. | Open-source, AI-driven endpoint investigation tool for security teams. |
| Category | Endpoint Security, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, AI | Endpoint Security, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Irvine, USA | United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,013 | 74 |
| Total funding | $136M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series E | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 323,935 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 85/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | B (74/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 10/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | PostHog |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) vs Puck: common questions
Which is better, Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) or Puck?
On our 0-100 score Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) rates higher (66/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) and Puck compare on the numbers?
Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) leads on our overall score (66/100 against 52/100), domain rating (90/100 against 10/100), headcount (2,013 against 74). Puck leads on agent readiness (74/100 against 41/100).
Read the full Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) review and pricing or the Puck review and pricing. You can also browse other Cylance (acquired by BlackBerry) alternatives we track.