Cycode vs Skyhawk Security
Cycode vs Skyhawk Security, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cycode is on 65/100 and Skyhawk Security on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Cycode
- our overall score: 65/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 134 against 36
- headcount growth: +52.1% against +5.3%
- funding raised: $80.6M against $35.0M
- LinkedIn following: 7,549 against 3,189
Skyhawk Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cycode | Skyhawk Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AppSec platform with built-in ASPM for unified security, development, and operations. | Cloud threat detection and response for sophisticated cloud infrastructure threats. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Information Technology (IT), Enterprise, Code | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Cloud Security, DevSecOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cycode | Skyhawk Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 134 | 36 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +52.1% | +5.3% |
| Total funding | $80.6M | $35.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Strategic |
| Valuation | Not published | $180M |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,549 | 3,189 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cycode | Skyhawk Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 100/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cycode | Skyhawk Security |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Alpinejs | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Zendesk, HubSpot | Not detected |
Cycode vs Skyhawk Security: common questions
Which is better, Cycode or Skyhawk Security?
On our 0-100 score Cycode rates higher (65/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cycode and Skyhawk Security compare on the numbers?
Cycode leads on our overall score (65/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 39/100), domain rating (71/100 against 30/100), headcount (134 against 36), headcount growth (+52.1% against +5.3%), funding raised ($80.6M against $35.0M), LinkedIn following (7,549 against 3,189).
Read the full Cycode review and pricing or the Skyhawk Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Cycode alternatives we track.