Cyclops Security vs Hunters AI
Cyclops Security vs Hunters AI, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyclops Security is on 53/100 and Hunters AI on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Cyclops Security
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 61/100
Hunters AI
- our overall score: 70/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 180 against 34
- funding raised: $118M against $6.4M
- LinkedIn following: 25,421 against 2,889
At a glance
| Measure | Cyclops Security | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Contextual search platform for cybersecurity, powered by GenAI and CSMA approach. | AI-powered SOC platform automating threat detection, investigation, and response for security teams. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Generative AI, Search Engine | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyclops Security | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 34 | 180 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +23.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $6.4M | $118M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,889 | 25,421 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyclops Security | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyclops Security | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Drift | HubSpot |
Cyclops Security vs Hunters AI: common questions
Which is better, Cyclops Security or Hunters AI?
On our 0-100 score Hunters AI rates higher (70/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyclops Security and Hunters AI compare on the numbers?
Cyclops Security leads on agent readiness (66/100 against 48/100), domain rating (90/100 against 61/100). Hunters AI leads on our overall score (70/100 against 53/100), headcount (180 against 34), funding raised ($118M against $6.4M), LinkedIn following (25,421 against 2,889).
Read the full Cyclops Security review and pricing or the Hunters AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyclops Security alternatives we track.