Cyclic Materials vs Refurbed
Cyclic Materials vs Refurbed, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyclic Materials is on 52/100 and Refurbed on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Cyclic Materials
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Refurbed
- domain rating: 69/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 286 against 89
- LinkedIn following: 30,083 against 14,054
At a glance
| Measure | Cyclic Materials | Refurbed |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Recovers and recycles rare earth elements and critical minerals from permanent magnets. | Refurbed is a leading European online marketplace for refurbished electronics. |
| Category | Circular Economy, Critical Minerals, Rare Earth Elements, Recycling | Circular Economy, E-commerce, Marketplace, Consumer Electronics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Services | Marketplace |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Kingston, Canada | Vienna, Austria |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyclic Materials | Refurbed |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 89 | 286 |
| Total funding | Not published | $167M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 14,054 | 30,083 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyclic Materials | Refurbed |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | Not published |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 54/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyclic Materials | Refurbed |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel | Microsoft Clarity |
Cyclic Materials vs Refurbed: common questions
Which is better, Cyclic Materials or Refurbed?
On our 0-100 score Cyclic Materials rates higher (52/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyclic Materials and Refurbed compare on the numbers?
Refurbed leads on domain rating (69/100 against 54/100), headcount (286 against 89), LinkedIn following (30,083 against 14,054).
Read the full Cyclic Materials review and pricing or the Refurbed review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyclic Materials alternatives we track.