Cyclic Materials vs DEScycle
Cyclic Materials vs DEScycle, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyclic Materials is on 52/100 and DEScycle on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Cyclic Materials
- our overall score: 52/100 against 46/100
- LinkedIn following: 14,054 against 2,698
DEScycle
- agent readiness: 35/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 54/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cyclic Materials | DEScycle |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Recovers and recycles rare earth elements and critical minerals from permanent magnets. | Next-generation metals processing infrastructure for critical and precious metals recovery. |
| Category | Circular Economy, Critical Minerals, Rare Earth Elements, Recycling | Metals Recycling, Deep Tech, Circular Economy, Critical Raw Materials |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Kingston, Canada | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyclic Materials | DEScycle |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 89 | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $12.2M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 14,054 | 2,698 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyclic Materials | DEScycle |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 54/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyclic Materials | DEScycle |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Sveltekit, Svelte |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel | Google Analytics 4 |
Cyclic Materials vs DEScycle: common questions
Which is better, Cyclic Materials or DEScycle?
On our 0-100 score Cyclic Materials rates higher (52/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyclic Materials and DEScycle compare on the numbers?
Cyclic Materials leads on our overall score (52/100 against 46/100), LinkedIn following (14,054 against 2,698). DEScycle leads on agent readiness (35/100 against 22/100), domain rating (72/100 against 54/100).
Read the full Cyclic Materials review and pricing or the DEScycle review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyclic Materials alternatives we track.