Cycles-Trader vs TradingView
Cycles-Trader vs TradingView, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cycles-Trader is on 22/100 and TradingView on 75/100.
Where each one leads
Cycles-Trader
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
TradingView
- our overall score: 75/100 against 22/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 2,773 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 100,288 against 103
At a glance
| Measure | Cycles-Trader | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered trend and timing forecasting for stock market trading. | Global platform for traders and investors with advanced charting and market data. |
| Category | Fintech, Finance, Algorithmic Trading, Stock Market Analysis | Fintech, Marketplace, Data Platform, Analytics Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Not published | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cycles-Trader | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 2,773 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +27.5% |
| Total funding | Not published | $389M |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 103 | 100,288 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cycles-Trader | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 22/100 | 75/100 |
| Traction | 5/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 17/100 | 59/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 2/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cycles-Trader | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cycles-Trader | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | Not published | $15 coupon |
Cycles-Trader vs TradingView: common questions
Which is better, Cycles-Trader or TradingView?
On our 0-100 score TradingView rates higher (75/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cycles-Trader and TradingView compare on the numbers?
TradingView leads on our overall score (75/100 against 22/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 35/100), domain rating (91/100 against 2/100), headcount (2,773 against 2), LinkedIn following (100,288 against 103).
Read the full Cycles-Trader review and pricing or the TradingView review and pricing. You can also browse other Cycles-Trader alternatives we track.