Cycle vs Glean
Cycle vs Glean, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cycle is on 32/100 and Glean on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Cycle
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Glean
- our overall score: 69/100 against 32/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 49/100
- funding raised: $410M against $6.2M
At a glance
| Measure | Cycle | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cycle is a platform that helps teams manage and share product knowledge, feedback, and decisions in one centralized place. | Glean is a Work AI platform that connects to all company data, enabling employees to find, create, and automate anything with AI assistants and agents. |
| Category | Product Management Software, Knowledge Management, Feedback Management, Collaboration Software | Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Search, Knowledge Management, Workplace AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Not published |
| Founded | Not published | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Palo Alto, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cycle | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 1,475 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +88.0% |
| Total funding | $6.2M | $410M |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 130,056 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cycle | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 32/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 34/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cycle | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cycle | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Glean Assistant, Glean Agents, Glean Search, Glean Protect, Connectors, APIs |
Cycle vs Glean: common questions
Which is better, Cycle or Glean?
On our 0-100 score Glean rates higher (69/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cycle and Glean compare on the numbers?
Glean leads on our overall score (69/100 against 32/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 21/100), domain rating (78/100 against 49/100), funding raised ($410M against $6.2M).
Read the full Cycle review and pricing or the Glean review and pricing. You can also browse other Cycle alternatives we track.