Cybord vs Tulip
Cybord vs Tulip, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cybord is on 55/100 and Tulip on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Cybord
- headcount growth: +114.0% against +3.0%
Tulip
- our overall score: 59/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 388 against 31
- funding raised: $153M against $8.7M
- LinkedIn following: 31,760 against 2,078
At a glance
| Measure | Cybord | Tulip |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered visual inspection for electronic component verification in SMT lines. | Tulip provides a cloud-based platform for frontline operations, empowering manufacturers to build apps for improved quality, efficiency, and traceability. |
| Category | Visual Inspection, Electronics, Manufacturing, IoT | Manufacturing, Manufacturing Software, Industrial IoT, Smart Manufacturing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Somerville, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cybord | Tulip |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 31 | 388 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +114.0% | +3.0% |
| Total funding | $8.7M | $153M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,078 | 31,760 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cybord | Tulip |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 30/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cybord | Tulip |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Cybord vs Tulip: common questions
Which is better, Cybord or Tulip?
On our 0-100 score Tulip rates higher (59/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cybord and Tulip compare on the numbers?
Cybord leads on headcount growth (+114.0% against +3.0%). Tulip leads on our overall score (59/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 35/100), domain rating (73/100 against 30/100), headcount (388 against 31), funding raised ($153M against $8.7M), LinkedIn following (31,760 against 2,078).
Read the full Cybord review and pricing or the Tulip review and pricing. You can also browse other Cybord alternatives we track.