Cybord vs Lingyi iTech Guangdong
Cybord vs Lingyi iTech Guangdong, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cybord is on 55/100 and Lingyi iTech Guangdong on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Cybord
- our overall score: 55/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 30/100 against 0/100
Lingyi iTech Guangdong
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 35/100
- funding raised: $1.1B against $8.7M
At a glance
| Measure | Cybord | Lingyi iTech Guangdong |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered visual inspection for electronic component verification in SMT lines. | A technology company preparing for a significant Hong Kong listing. |
| Category | Visual Inspection, Electronics, Manufacturing, IoT | Industrial Automation, Smart Manufacturing, IoT, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2003 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Guangdong, China |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cybord | Lingyi iTech Guangdong |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 31 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +114.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $8.7M | $1.1B |
| Latest round | Series A | IPO |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,078 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cybord | Lingyi iTech Guangdong |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 30/100 | 0/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cybord | Lingyi iTech Guangdong |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Cybord vs Lingyi iTech Guangdong: common questions
Which is better, Cybord or Lingyi iTech Guangdong?
On our 0-100 score Cybord rates higher (55/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cybord and Lingyi iTech Guangdong compare on the numbers?
Cybord leads on our overall score (55/100 against 49/100), domain rating (30/100 against 0/100). Lingyi iTech Guangdong leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 35/100), funding raised ($1.1B against $8.7M).
Read the full Cybord review and pricing or the Lingyi iTech Guangdong review and pricing. You can also browse other Cybord alternatives we track.