CyberX Labs vs Salvador Technologies
CyberX Labs vs Salvador Technologies, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CyberX Labs is on 61/100 and Salvador Technologies on 55/100.
Where each one leads
CyberX Labs
- our overall score: 61/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 57/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 47 against 27
- funding raised: $45.0M against $8.5M
- LinkedIn following: 12,065 against 4,594
Salvador Technologies
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Salvador Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CyberX Labs provides complete visibility and real-time threat detection for industrial control systems and operational technology (OT) networks. | Provides rapid cyber-attack recovery for industrial control systems, ensuring operational continuity. |
| Category | Industrial, Cybersecurity, Control Systems, SCADA | Industrial Control Systems, Industrial, Cybersecurity, Operational Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Salvador Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 47 | 27 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +8.5% |
| Total funding | $45.0M | $8.5M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,065 | 4,594 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Salvador Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 26/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Salvador Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Google Cloud |
What users say
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Salvador Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“Security vendors. I've seen some discussed but was wondering who here has any experience with the Claroty's, Nozomi's CyberX Labs out there. We have put the three I mentioned to a POC, and thus far all have impressed for different reasons.”r/PLC
CyberX Labs vs Salvador Technologies: common questions
Which is better, CyberX Labs or Salvador Technologies?
On our 0-100 score CyberX Labs rates higher (61/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CyberX Labs and Salvador Technologies compare on the numbers?
CyberX Labs leads on our overall score (61/100 against 55/100), domain rating (57/100 against 38/100), headcount (47 against 27), funding raised ($45.0M against $8.5M), LinkedIn following (12,065 against 4,594). Salvador Technologies leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 21/100).
What do real users say about CyberX Labs and Salvador Technologies?
CyberX Labs: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/PLC.
Read the full CyberX Labs review and pricing or the Salvador Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other CyberX Labs alternatives we track.