CyberX Labs vs Rail Vision
CyberX Labs vs Rail Vision, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CyberX Labs is on 61/100 and Rail Vision on 48/100.
Where each one leads
CyberX Labs
- our overall score: 61/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 56/100 against 38/100
- funding raised: $45.0M against $18.0M
- LinkedIn following: 12,065 against 6,111
Rail Vision
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 100 against 47
At a glance
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Rail Vision |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CyberX Labs provides complete visibility and real-time threat detection for industrial control systems and operational technology (OT) networks. | Automated early-warning system for train safety detecting track hazards. |
| Category | Industrial, Cybersecurity, Control Systems, SCADA | Industrial, Cybersecurity, Locomotive, Rail Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G | B2B, B2G |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Rail Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 47 | 100 |
| Total funding | $45.0M | $18.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $25.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,065 | 6,111 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Rail Vision |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Rail Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
What users say
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Rail Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“Security vendors. I've seen some discussed but was wondering who here has any experience with the Claroty's, Nozomi's CyberX Labs out there. We have put the three I mentioned to a POC, and thus far all have impressed for different reasons.”r/PLC
CyberX Labs vs Rail Vision: common questions
Which is better, CyberX Labs or Rail Vision?
On our 0-100 score CyberX Labs rates higher (61/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CyberX Labs and Rail Vision compare on the numbers?
CyberX Labs leads on our overall score (61/100 against 48/100), domain rating (56/100 against 38/100), funding raised ($45.0M against $18.0M), LinkedIn following (12,065 against 6,111). Rail Vision leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 21/100), headcount (100 against 47).
What do real users say about CyberX Labs and Rail Vision?
CyberX Labs: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/PLC.
Read the full CyberX Labs review and pricing or the Rail Vision review and pricing. You can also browse other CyberX Labs alternatives we track.