CyberX Labs vs optiQGain
CyberX Labs vs optiQGain, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CyberX Labs is on 61/100 and optiQGain on 44/100.
Where each one leads
CyberX Labs
- our overall score: 61/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 57/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 47 against 2
- funding raised: $45.0M against $7.0M
- LinkedIn following: 12,065 against 198
optiQGain
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CyberX Labs | optiQGain |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CyberX Labs provides complete visibility and real-time threat detection for industrial control systems and operational technology (OT) networks. | optiQGain develops SRSensor, a high-resolution, real-time gas analyzer for the process industry. |
| Category | Industrial, Cybersecurity, Control Systems, SCADA | Industrial, Spectrometry, Industrial IoT, Smart Sensors |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2012 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CyberX Labs | optiQGain |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 47 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +47.0% |
| Total funding | $45.0M | $7.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Grant |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,065 | 198 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CyberX Labs | optiQGain |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CyberX Labs | optiQGain |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | CyberX Labs | optiQGain |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“Security vendors. I've seen some discussed but was wondering who here has any experience with the Claroty's, Nozomi's CyberX Labs out there. We have put the three I mentioned to a POC, and thus far all have impressed for different reasons.”r/PLC
CyberX Labs vs optiQGain: common questions
Which is better, CyberX Labs or optiQGain?
On our 0-100 score CyberX Labs rates higher (61/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CyberX Labs and optiQGain compare on the numbers?
CyberX Labs leads on our overall score (61/100 against 44/100), domain rating (57/100 against 31/100), headcount (47 against 2), funding raised ($45.0M against $7.0M), LinkedIn following (12,065 against 198).
What do real users say about CyberX Labs and optiQGain?
CyberX Labs: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/PLC.
Read the full CyberX Labs review and pricing or the optiQGain review and pricing. You can also browse other CyberX Labs alternatives we track.