CyberX Labs vs Kelvingo
CyberX Labs vs Kelvingo, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CyberX Labs is on 61/100 and Kelvingo on 20/100.
Where each one leads
CyberX Labs
- our overall score: 61/100 against 20/100
- LinkedIn following: 12,065 against 4,322
Kelvingo
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 108 against 47
At a glance
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Kelvingo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CyberX Labs provides complete visibility and real-time threat detection for industrial control systems and operational technology (OT) networks. | AI software developer providing computer vision and machine learning tools for home energy audits. |
| Category | Industrial, Cybersecurity, Control Systems, SCADA | AI Software, Computer Vision, Machine Learning, Home Energy Audits |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Kelvingo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 47 | 108 |
| Total funding | $45.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,065 | 4,322 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Kelvingo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 20/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Kelvingo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Kelvingo |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“Security vendors. I've seen some discussed but was wondering who here has any experience with the Claroty's, Nozomi's CyberX Labs out there. We have put the three I mentioned to a POC, and thus far all have impressed for different reasons.”r/PLC
CyberX Labs vs Kelvingo: common questions
Which is better, CyberX Labs or Kelvingo?
On our 0-100 score CyberX Labs rates higher (61/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CyberX Labs and Kelvingo compare on the numbers?
CyberX Labs leads on our overall score (61/100 against 20/100), LinkedIn following (12,065 against 4,322). Kelvingo leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 21/100), headcount (108 against 47).
What do real users say about CyberX Labs and Kelvingo?
CyberX Labs: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/PLC.
Read the full CyberX Labs review and pricing or the Kelvingo review and pricing. You can also browse other CyberX Labs alternatives we track.