CyberX Labs vs Field Effect
CyberX Labs vs Field Effect, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CyberX Labs is on 61/100 and Field Effect on 49/100.
Where each one leads
CyberX Labs
- our overall score: 61/100 against 49/100
- LinkedIn following: 12,065 against 6,696
Field Effect
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 57/100
- headcount: 150 against 47
At a glance
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Field Effect |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CyberX Labs provides complete visibility and real-time threat detection for industrial control systems and operational technology (OT) networks. | Cybersecurity platform for operational technology (OT) and industrial control systems. |
| Category | Industrial, Cybersecurity, Control Systems, SCADA | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, OT Security, ICS Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Ottawa, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Field Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 47 | 150 |
| Total funding | $45.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,065 | 6,696 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Field Effect |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Field Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot, Freshdesk |
What users say
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Field Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“Security vendors. I've seen some discussed but was wondering who here has any experience with the Claroty's, Nozomi's CyberX Labs out there. We have put the three I mentioned to a POC, and thus far all have impressed for different reasons.”r/PLC
CyberX Labs vs Field Effect: common questions
Which is better, CyberX Labs or Field Effect?
On our 0-100 score CyberX Labs rates higher (61/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CyberX Labs and Field Effect compare on the numbers?
CyberX Labs leads on our overall score (61/100 against 49/100), LinkedIn following (12,065 against 6,696). Field Effect leads on agent readiness (37/100 against 21/100), domain rating (66/100 against 57/100), headcount (150 against 47).
What do real users say about CyberX Labs and Field Effect?
CyberX Labs: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/PLC.
Read the full CyberX Labs review and pricing or the Field Effect review and pricing. You can also browse other CyberX Labs alternatives we track.