CyberX Labs vs Diagsense
CyberX Labs vs Diagsense, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CyberX Labs is on 61/100 and Diagsense on 36/100.
Where each one leads
CyberX Labs
- our overall score: 61/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 57/100 against 3/100
- headcount: 47 against 2
- funding raised: $45.0M against $100K
- LinkedIn following: 12,065 against 96
Diagsense
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Diagsense |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CyberX Labs provides complete visibility and real-time threat detection for industrial control systems and operational technology (OT) networks. | Diagsense provides an AI-powered predictive maintenance solution for industrial machinery and pipelines, learning normal operations to detect anomalies. |
| Category | Industrial, Cybersecurity, Control Systems, SCADA | Industrial, Maintenance, Industrial IoT, Predictive Maintenance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Diagsense |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 47 | 2 |
| Total funding | $45.0M | $100K |
| Latest round | Series C | Grant |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,065 | 96 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Diagsense |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 36/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 30/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 3/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Diagsense |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
What users say
| Measure | CyberX Labs | Diagsense |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“Security vendors. I've seen some discussed but was wondering who here has any experience with the Claroty's, Nozomi's CyberX Labs out there. We have put the three I mentioned to a POC, and thus far all have impressed for different reasons.”r/PLC
CyberX Labs vs Diagsense: common questions
Which is better, CyberX Labs or Diagsense?
On our 0-100 score CyberX Labs rates higher (61/100 against 36/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CyberX Labs and Diagsense compare on the numbers?
CyberX Labs leads on our overall score (61/100 against 36/100), domain rating (57/100 against 3/100), headcount (47 against 2), funding raised ($45.0M against $100K), LinkedIn following (12,065 against 96).
What do real users say about CyberX Labs and Diagsense?
CyberX Labs: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/PLC.
Read the full CyberX Labs review and pricing or the Diagsense review and pricing. You can also browse other CyberX Labs alternatives we track.