Cyberwrite vs Earnix
Cyberwrite vs Earnix, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyberwrite is on 44/100 and Earnix on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Cyberwrite
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Earnix
- our overall score: 62/100 against 44/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 453 against 13
- headcount growth: +8.6% against -4.3%
- funding raised: $219M against $200K
- LinkedIn following: 40,895 against 3,445
At a glance
| Measure | Cyberwrite | Earnix |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered cyber insurance platform for risk quantification and security insights. | Global provider of intelligent insurance and banking operations with agile, composable, real-time solutions. |
| Category | Fintech, Insurance, Cyber, Underwriting | Fintech, Insurance, Pricing, Analytics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyberwrite | Earnix |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 13 | 453 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -4.3% | +8.6% |
| Total funding | $200K | $219M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Secondary Transaction |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,445 | 40,895 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyberwrite | Earnix |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 44/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 32/100 | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyberwrite | Earnix |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Render | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Base44 | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Fathom |
Cyberwrite vs Earnix: common questions
Which is better, Cyberwrite or Earnix?
On our 0-100 score Earnix rates higher (62/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyberwrite and Earnix compare on the numbers?
Earnix leads on our overall score (62/100 against 44/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 36/100), domain rating (64/100 against 32/100), headcount (453 against 13), headcount growth (+8.6% against -4.3%), funding raised ($219M against $200K), LinkedIn following (40,895 against 3,445).
Read the full Cyberwrite review and pricing or the Earnix review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyberwrite alternatives we track.