CyberVista vs Veracode
CyberVista vs Veracode, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CyberVista is on 52/100 and Veracode on 62/100.
Where each one leads
CyberVista
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Veracode
- our overall score: 62/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 503 against 33
- funding raised: $40.0M against $5.4M
At a glance
| Measure | CyberVista | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity training and workforce development company focused on closing the industry skills gap. | Veracode provides a SaaS platform for application security testing and risk management. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, EdTech, SaaS | Cybersecurity, SaaS, Software Development |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Arlington, United States | Burlington, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CyberVista | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 33 | 503 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -10.4% |
| Total funding | $5.4M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series F |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 85,248 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CyberVista | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CyberVista | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
CyberVista vs Veracode: common questions
Which is better, CyberVista or Veracode?
On our 0-100 score Veracode rates higher (62/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CyberVista and Veracode compare on the numbers?
Veracode leads on our overall score (62/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 35/100), domain rating (80/100 against 61/100), headcount (503 against 33), funding raised ($40.0M against $5.4M).
Read the full CyberVista review and pricing or the Veracode review and pricing. You can also browse other CyberVista alternatives we track.