CyberShield vs Wordfence
CyberShield vs Wordfence, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CyberShield is on 26/100 and Wordfence on 54/100.
Where each one leads
CyberShield
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Wordfence
- our overall score: 54/100 against 26/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 4/100
At a glance
| Measure | CyberShield | Wordfence |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Proactive threat detection and response for SMBs. | Comprehensive WordPress security plugin offering firewall, malware scanner, and login protection. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, SMB Software | Cybersecurity, Endpoint Security, Threat Detection, Web Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Indianapolis, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CyberShield | Wordfence |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | Not published | $28.1M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CyberShield | Wordfence |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 26/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 31/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 5/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 4/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CyberShield | Wordfence |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| Support stack | Not detected | Freshdesk, HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | CyberShield | Wordfence |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 6 negative across 6 threads |
“Well, I have so far always used Wordfence to secure my sites, but one thing they all had in common was the clutter i received in the databases. Is there a way to avoid this? Or shall I use an alternative?”r/Wordpress
CyberShield vs Wordfence: common questions
Which is better, CyberShield or Wordfence?
On our 0-100 score Wordfence rates higher (54/100 against 26/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CyberShield and Wordfence compare on the numbers?
Wordfence leads on our overall score (54/100 against 26/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 22/100), domain rating (91/100 against 4/100).
What do real users say about CyberShield and Wordfence?
Wordfence: 0 positive and 6 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Wordpress.
Read the full CyberShield review and pricing or the Wordfence review and pricing. You can also browse other CyberShield alternatives we track.