Cyberscope vs Hacken
Cyberscope vs Hacken, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyberscope is on 16/100 and Hacken on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Cyberscope
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Hacken
- our overall score: 55/100 against 16/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 123 against 28
- LinkedIn following: 15,297 against 7,351
At a glance
| Measure | Cyberscope | Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Institutional-grade security solutions for Web3 ecosystems, integrating audits, monitoring, and compliance. | Hacken offers cybersecurity services for the Web3 industry, including smart contract audits and penetration testing. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Web3, Blockchain, DeFi | Not published |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2022 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tallinn, Estonia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyberscope | Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 28 | 123 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +313.6% | Not published |
| Open roles | 4 | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $2.9M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,351 | 15,297 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyberscope | Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 16/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 14/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyberscope | Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Segment | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Cyberscope vs Hacken: common questions
Which is better, Cyberscope or Hacken?
On our 0-100 score Hacken rates higher (55/100 against 16/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyberscope and Hacken compare on the numbers?
Hacken leads on our overall score (55/100 against 16/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 36/100), headcount (123 against 28), LinkedIn following (15,297 against 7,351).
Read the full Cyberscope review and pricing or the Hacken review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyberscope alternatives we track.