CyberMDX vs Neural Guard
CyberMDX vs Neural Guard, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CyberMDX is on 54/100 and Neural Guard on 37/100.
Where each one leads
CyberMDX
- our overall score: 54/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 38/100
- LinkedIn following: 8,454 against 810
Neural Guard
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 30 against 8
- headcount growth: +33.1% against -39.5%
At a glance
| Measure | CyberMDX | Neural Guard |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Healthcare cybersecurity platform protecting medical devices and hospital networks from cyber threats. | AI-powered security solutions for automated threat detection and analysis. |
| Category | Healthcare, Cybersecurity, Healthcare Cybersecurity, MedTech | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Computed Tomography (CT), Homeland Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CyberMDX | Neural Guard |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -39.5% | +33.1% |
| Total funding | $30.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,454 | 810 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CyberMDX | Neural Guard |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 37/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 15/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 41/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CyberMDX | Neural Guard |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
CyberMDX vs Neural Guard: common questions
Which is better, CyberMDX or Neural Guard?
On our 0-100 score CyberMDX rates higher (54/100 against 37/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CyberMDX and Neural Guard compare on the numbers?
CyberMDX leads on our overall score (54/100 against 37/100), domain rating (53/100 against 38/100), LinkedIn following (8,454 against 810). Neural Guard leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 22/100), headcount (30 against 8), headcount growth (+33.1% against -39.5%).
Read the full CyberMDX review and pricing or the Neural Guard review and pricing. You can also browse other CyberMDX alternatives we track.