CyberMDX vs Forescout
CyberMDX vs Forescout, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CyberMDX is on 54/100 and Forescout on 61/100.
Where each one leads
CyberMDX
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Forescout
- our overall score: 61/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 1,341 against 8
- headcount growth: +12.4% against -39.5%
- funding raised: $123M against $30.0M
- LinkedIn following: 71,860 against 8,454
At a glance
| Measure | CyberMDX | Forescout |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Healthcare cybersecurity platform protecting medical devices and hospital networks from cyber threats. | Enterprise of Things cybersecurity platform for identifying, segmenting, and enforcing compliance of connected devices. |
| Category | Healthcare, Cybersecurity, Healthcare Cybersecurity, MedTech | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, IoT, Industrial |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CyberMDX | Forescout |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8 | 1,341 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -39.5% | +12.4% |
| Total funding | $30.0M | $123M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,454 | 71,860 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CyberMDX | Forescout |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CyberMDX | Forescout |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
CyberMDX vs Forescout: common questions
Which is better, CyberMDX or Forescout?
On our 0-100 score Forescout rates higher (61/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CyberMDX and Forescout compare on the numbers?
Forescout leads on our overall score (61/100 against 54/100), domain rating (76/100 against 53/100), headcount (1,341 against 8), headcount growth (+12.4% against -39.5%), funding raised ($123M against $30.0M), LinkedIn following (71,860 against 8,454).
Read the full CyberMDX review and pricing or the Forescout review and pricing. You can also browse other CyberMDX alternatives we track.