Cyberint vs XM Cyber
Cyberint vs XM Cyber, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyberint is on 55/100 and XM Cyber on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Cyberint
- funding raised: $69.0M against $54.0M
XM Cyber
- our overall score: 62/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 444 against 171
- headcount growth: +31.4% against +14.4%
- LinkedIn following: 35,814 against 15,908
At a glance
| Measure | Cyberint | XM Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyberint provides integrated threat intelligence and attack surface management for external risk visibility. | Automated APT simulation platform to continuously expose and remediate cyber attack vectors. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Intelligence, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Attack Surface Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyberint | XM Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 171 | 444 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.4% | +31.4% |
| Total funding | $69.0M | $54.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 15,908 | 35,814 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyberint | XM Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyberint | XM Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Cyberint | XM Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 3 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Check Point Software Emerges as a Leader in Attack Surface Management After Acquiring Cyberint, According to Latest GigaOm Radar Report.”r/Quantisnow
Cyberint vs XM Cyber: common questions
Which is better, Cyberint or XM Cyber?
On our 0-100 score XM Cyber rates higher (62/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyberint and XM Cyber compare on the numbers?
Cyberint leads on funding raised ($69.0M against $54.0M). XM Cyber leads on our overall score (62/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 25/100), headcount (444 against 171), headcount growth (+31.4% against +14.4%), LinkedIn following (35,814 against 15,908).
What do real users say about Cyberint and XM Cyber?
Cyberint: 3 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Quantisnow.
Read the full Cyberint review and pricing or the XM Cyber review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyberint alternatives we track.