Cyberint vs UMATCH Analytics
Cyberint vs UMATCH Analytics, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyberint is on 55/100 and UMATCH Analytics on 10/100.
Where each one leads
Cyberint
- our overall score: 55/100 against 10/100
- agent readiness: 25/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 171 against 4
UMATCH Analytics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cyberint | UMATCH Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyberint provides integrated threat intelligence and attack surface management for external risk visibility. | Next-gen business intelligence platform leveraging Israeli espionage methodologies and cyber-intelligence for actionable business insights. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Intelligence, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Intelligence, Business Intelligence, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C, B2B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyberint | UMATCH Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 171 | 4 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $69.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Bootstrapped |
| LinkedIn followers | 15,908 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyberint | UMATCH Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 10/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 7/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 7/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 1/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyberint | UMATCH Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Cyberint | UMATCH Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 3 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Check Point Software Emerges as a Leader in Attack Surface Management After Acquiring Cyberint, According to Latest GigaOm Radar Report.”r/Quantisnow
Cyberint vs UMATCH Analytics: common questions
Which is better, Cyberint or UMATCH Analytics?
On our 0-100 score Cyberint rates higher (55/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyberint and UMATCH Analytics compare on the numbers?
Cyberint leads on our overall score (55/100 against 10/100), agent readiness (25/100 against 22/100), domain rating (70/100 against 1/100), headcount (171 against 4).
What do real users say about Cyberint and UMATCH Analytics?
Cyberint: 3 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Quantisnow.
Read the full Cyberint review and pricing or the UMATCH Analytics review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyberint alternatives we track.