Cyberint vs Pentera
Cyberint vs Pentera, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyberint is on 55/100 and Pentera on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Cyberint
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Pentera
- our overall score: 68/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 487 against 171
- funding raised: $175M against $69.0M
- LinkedIn following: 93,381 against 15,908
At a glance
| Measure | Cyberint | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyberint provides integrated threat intelligence and attack surface management for external risk visibility. | Automated security validation platform to continuously test and reduce cyber exposure. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Intelligence, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Penetration Testing, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyberint | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 171 | 487 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.4% | +14.1% |
| Total funding | $69.0M | $175M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 15,908 | 93,381 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyberint | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 79/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyberint | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Cyberint | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 3 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Check Point Software Emerges as a Leader in Attack Surface Management After Acquiring Cyberint, According to Latest GigaOm Radar Report.”r/Quantisnow
Cyberint vs Pentera: common questions
Which is better, Cyberint or Pentera?
On our 0-100 score Pentera rates higher (68/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyberint and Pentera compare on the numbers?
Pentera leads on our overall score (68/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 25/100), headcount (487 against 171), funding raised ($175M against $69.0M), LinkedIn following (93,381 against 15,908).
What do real users say about Cyberint and Pentera?
Cyberint: 3 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Quantisnow.
Read the full Cyberint review and pricing or the Pentera review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyberint alternatives we track.