Cyberint vs Opora
Cyberint vs Opora, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyberint is on 55/100 and Opora on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Cyberint
- our overall score: 55/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 6/100
- headcount: 171 against 23
- headcount growth: +14.4% against -38.1%
- funding raised: $69.0M against $7.0M
- LinkedIn following: 15,908 against 2,140
Opora
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 25/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cyberint | Opora |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyberint provides integrated threat intelligence and attack surface management for external risk visibility. | Cognitive-based threat quantification for business ecosystems and supply chains. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Intelligence, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Intelligence, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyberint | Opora |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 171 | 23 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.4% | -38.1% |
| Total funding | $69.0M | $7.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 15,908 | 2,140 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyberint | Opora |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 48/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 6/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyberint | Opora |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Cyberint | Opora |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 3 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Check Point Software Emerges as a Leader in Attack Surface Management After Acquiring Cyberint, According to Latest GigaOm Radar Report.”r/Quantisnow
Cyberint vs Opora: common questions
Which is better, Cyberint or Opora?
On our 0-100 score Cyberint rates higher (55/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyberint and Opora compare on the numbers?
Cyberint leads on our overall score (55/100 against 47/100), domain rating (70/100 against 6/100), headcount (171 against 23), headcount growth (+14.4% against -38.1%), funding raised ($69.0M against $7.0M), LinkedIn following (15,908 against 2,140). Opora leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 25/100).
What do real users say about Cyberint and Opora?
Cyberint: 3 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Quantisnow.
Read the full Cyberint review and pricing or the Opora review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyberint alternatives we track.