CyberGuard AI vs Hunters
CyberGuard AI vs Hunters, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CyberGuard AI is on 48/100 and Hunters on 60/100.
Where each one leads
CyberGuard AI
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 61/100
- funding raised: $1.0B against $103M
Hunters
- our overall score: 60/100 against 48/100
- LinkedIn following: 25,498 against 6,685
At a glance
| Measure | CyberGuard AI | Hunters |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Atom is a mobile-first digital bank offering personal and business banking services in the UK. | AI-powered platform for threat detection, investigation, and response in cybersecurity. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Machine Learning, Endpoint Security | Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response (XDR), Threat Detection, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Durham, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CyberGuard AI | Hunters |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 164 | 187 |
| Total funding | $1.0B | $103M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,685 | 25,498 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CyberGuard AI | Hunters |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CyberGuard AI | Hunters |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
CyberGuard AI vs Hunters: common questions
Which is better, CyberGuard AI or Hunters?
On our 0-100 score Hunters rates higher (60/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CyberGuard AI and Hunters compare on the numbers?
CyberGuard AI leads on agent readiness (59/100 against 40/100), domain rating (90/100 against 61/100), funding raised ($1.0B against $103M). Hunters leads on our overall score (60/100 against 48/100), LinkedIn following (25,498 against 6,685).
Read the full CyberGuard AI review and pricing or the Hunters review and pricing. You can also browse other CyberGuard AI alternatives we track.