CyberGuard AI vs Cylance
CyberGuard AI vs Cylance, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CyberGuard AI is on 48/100 and Cylance on 43/100.
Where each one leads
CyberGuard AI
- our overall score: 48/100 against 43/100
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 79/100
- funding raised: $1.0B against $162M
Cylance
- headcount: 3,297 against 164
- LinkedIn following: 145,339 against 6,685
At a glance
| Measure | CyberGuard AI | Cylance |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Atom is a mobile-first digital bank offering personal and business banking services in the UK. | Cylance provides AI-powered cybersecurity solutions for endpoint protection, threat detection, and incident response. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Machine Learning, Endpoint Security | Cybersecurity, Endpoint Security, Threat Detection, Incident Response |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Durham, United Kingdom | Irvine, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CyberGuard AI | Cylance |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 164 | 3,297 |
| Total funding | $1.0B | $162M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,685 | 145,339 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CyberGuard AI | Cylance |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 43/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 10/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CyberGuard AI | Cylance |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
CyberGuard AI vs Cylance: common questions
Which is better, CyberGuard AI or Cylance?
On our 0-100 score CyberGuard AI rates higher (48/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CyberGuard AI and Cylance compare on the numbers?
CyberGuard AI leads on our overall score (48/100 against 43/100), agent readiness (59/100 against 47/100), domain rating (90/100 against 79/100), funding raised ($1.0B against $162M). Cylance leads on headcount (3,297 against 164), LinkedIn following (145,339 against 6,685).
Read the full CyberGuard AI review and pricing or the Cylance review and pricing. You can also browse other CyberGuard AI alternatives we track.