Cyberfish vs Mimecast
Cyberfish vs Mimecast, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyberfish is on 49/100 and Mimecast on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Cyberfish
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Mimecast
- our overall score: 55/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 16/100
- headcount: 2,441 against 9
At a glance
| Measure | Cyberfish | Mimecast |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered cybersecurity platform protecting against sophisticated phishing attacks using computer vision and contextual training. | Global cybersecurity company specializing in email security and human risk management. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Phishing, Threat Detection | Cybersecurity, Email Security, Risk Management, Data Protection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2003 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyberfish | Mimecast |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | 2,441 |
| Total funding | Not published | $239M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 842 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyberfish | Mimecast |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 10/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 16/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyberfish | Mimecast |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Azure |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Cyberfish vs Mimecast: common questions
Which is better, Cyberfish or Mimecast?
On our 0-100 score Mimecast rates higher (55/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyberfish and Mimecast compare on the numbers?
Mimecast leads on our overall score (55/100 against 49/100), domain rating (91/100 against 16/100), headcount (2,441 against 9).
Read the full Cyberfish review and pricing or the Mimecast review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyberfish alternatives we track.