Cybereason vs SafeBreach
Cybereason vs SafeBreach, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cybereason is on 56/100 and SafeBreach on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Cybereason
- headcount: 676 against 141
- funding raised: $934M against $141M
- LinkedIn following: 88,003 against 23,010
SafeBreach
- our overall score: 61/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 33/100
- headcount growth: +500.0% against -20.0%
At a glance
| Measure | Cybereason | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybereason provides a comprehensive cybersecurity platform that prevents, detects, and responds to cyber attacks using AI-driven endpoint protection. | SafeBreach offers a continuous security validation platform that simulates breach and attack scenarios to identify security gaps. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Forensics | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Breach and Attack Simulation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cybereason | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 676 | 141 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -20.0% | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $934M | $141M |
| Latest round | Series H | Series D Extension |
| Valuation | $350M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 88,003 | 23,010 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cybereason | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cybereason | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Cybereason | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“I currently have Cybereason and I've had a good experience with them, but if I'm being honest my IT group is small and doesn't have a ton of time to manage A/V. Cybereason has been good in that we've had no major virus issues, but their int”r/cybersecurity
Cybereason vs SafeBreach: common questions
Which is better, Cybereason or SafeBreach?
On our 0-100 score SafeBreach rates higher (61/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cybereason and SafeBreach compare on the numbers?
Cybereason leads on headcount (676 against 141), funding raised ($934M against $141M), LinkedIn following (88,003 against 23,010). SafeBreach leads on our overall score (61/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 33/100), headcount growth (+500.0% against -20.0%).
What do real users say about Cybereason and SafeBreach?
Cybereason: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/cybersecurity.
Read the full Cybereason review and pricing or the SafeBreach review and pricing. You can also browse other Cybereason alternatives we track.