Cybereason vs Perception Point
Cybereason vs Perception Point, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cybereason is on 56/100 and Perception Point on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Cybereason
- headcount: 676 against 17
- headcount growth: -20.0% against -46.3%
- funding raised: $934M against $38.0M
- LinkedIn following: 88,003 against 13,315
Perception Point
- our overall score: 65/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 89/100 against 76/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cybereason | Perception Point |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybereason provides a comprehensive cybersecurity platform that prevents, detects, and responds to cyber attacks using AI-driven endpoint protection. | Prevention-as-a-Service for next-gen threat detection across email, web, and cloud apps. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Forensics | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Phishing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cybereason | Perception Point |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 676 | 17 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -20.0% | -46.3% |
| Total funding | $934M | $38.0M |
| Latest round | Series H | Series B |
| Valuation | $350M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 88,003 | 13,315 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cybereason | Perception Point |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 89/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cybereason | Perception Point |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Cybereason | Perception Point |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“I currently have Cybereason and I've had a good experience with them, but if I'm being honest my IT group is small and doesn't have a ton of time to manage A/V. Cybereason has been good in that we've had no major virus issues, but their int”r/cybersecurity
Cybereason vs Perception Point: common questions
Which is better, Cybereason or Perception Point?
On our 0-100 score Perception Point rates higher (65/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cybereason and Perception Point compare on the numbers?
Cybereason leads on headcount (676 against 17), headcount growth (-20.0% against -46.3%), funding raised ($934M against $38.0M), LinkedIn following (88,003 against 13,315). Perception Point leads on our overall score (65/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 33/100), domain rating (89/100 against 76/100).
What do real users say about Cybereason and Perception Point?
Cybereason: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/cybersecurity.
Read the full Cybereason review and pricing or the Perception Point review and pricing. You can also browse other Cybereason alternatives we track.