Cybereason vs Hunters AI
Cybereason vs Hunters AI, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cybereason is on 56/100 and Hunters AI on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Cybereason
- domain rating: 76/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 676 against 180
- funding raised: $934M against $118M
- LinkedIn following: 88,003 against 25,421
Hunters AI
- our overall score: 70/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 33/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cybereason | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybereason provides a comprehensive cybersecurity platform that prevents, detects, and responds to cyber attacks using AI-driven endpoint protection. | AI-powered SOC platform automating threat detection, investigation, and response for security teams. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Forensics | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cybereason | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 676 | 180 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -20.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $934M | $118M |
| Latest round | Series H | Series C |
| Valuation | $350M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 88,003 | 25,421 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cybereason | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cybereason | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Cybereason | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“I currently have Cybereason and I've had a good experience with them, but if I'm being honest my IT group is small and doesn't have a ton of time to manage A/V. Cybereason has been good in that we've had no major virus issues, but their int”r/cybersecurity
Cybereason vs Hunters AI: common questions
Which is better, Cybereason or Hunters AI?
On our 0-100 score Hunters AI rates higher (70/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cybereason and Hunters AI compare on the numbers?
Cybereason leads on domain rating (76/100 against 61/100), headcount (676 against 180), funding raised ($934M against $118M), LinkedIn following (88,003 against 25,421). Hunters AI leads on our overall score (70/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 33/100).
What do real users say about Cybereason and Hunters AI?
Cybereason: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/cybersecurity.
Read the full Cybereason review and pricing or the Hunters AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Cybereason alternatives we track.