Cybereason vs ForceNock
Cybereason vs ForceNock, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cybereason is on 56/100 and ForceNock on 35/100.
Where each one leads
Cybereason
- our overall score: 56/100 against 35/100
- agent readiness: 33/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 0/100
- headcount: 676 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 88,003 against 157
ForceNock
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cybereason | ForceNock |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybereason provides a comprehensive cybersecurity platform that prevents, detects, and responds to cyber attacks using AI-driven endpoint protection. | ForceNock developed a Web Application and API Protection (WAAP) technology utilizing machine learning, behavioral, and reputation-based security engines. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Forensics | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Web Application Security, API Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cybereason | ForceNock |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 676 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -20.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $934M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series H | Bootstrapped |
| Valuation | $350M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 88,003 | 157 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cybereason | ForceNock |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 35/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 0/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cybereason | ForceNock |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Cybereason | ForceNock |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“I currently have Cybereason and I've had a good experience with them, but if I'm being honest my IT group is small and doesn't have a ton of time to manage A/V. Cybereason has been good in that we've had no major virus issues, but their int”r/cybersecurity
Cybereason vs ForceNock: common questions
Which is better, Cybereason or ForceNock?
On our 0-100 score Cybereason rates higher (56/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cybereason and ForceNock compare on the numbers?
Cybereason leads on our overall score (56/100 against 35/100), agent readiness (33/100 against 22/100), domain rating (76/100 against 0/100), headcount (676 against 2), LinkedIn following (88,003 against 157).
What do real users say about Cybereason and ForceNock?
Cybereason: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/cybersecurity.
Read the full Cybereason review and pricing or the ForceNock review and pricing. You can also browse other Cybereason alternatives we track.