Cybereason vs CYREBRO
Cybereason vs CYREBRO, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cybereason is on 56/100 and CYREBRO on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Cybereason
- domain rating: 76/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 676 against 143
- funding raised: $934M against $66.0M
- LinkedIn following: 88,003 against 10,583
CYREBRO
- our overall score: 61/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 33/100
- headcount growth: -15.9% against -20.0%
At a glance
| Measure | Cybereason | CYREBRO |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybereason provides a comprehensive cybersecurity platform that prevents, detects, and responds to cyber attacks using AI-driven endpoint protection. | CYREBRO provides a managed detection and response (MDR) solution, offering a full-fledged Security Operations Center (SOC) to organizations. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Forensics | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Managed Detection and Response |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cybereason | CYREBRO |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 676 | 143 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -20.0% | -15.9% |
| Total funding | $934M | $66.0M |
| Latest round | Series H | Series C |
| Valuation | $350M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 88,003 | 10,583 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cybereason | CYREBRO |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cybereason | CYREBRO |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Cybereason | CYREBRO |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“I currently have Cybereason and I've had a good experience with them, but if I'm being honest my IT group is small and doesn't have a ton of time to manage A/V. Cybereason has been good in that we've had no major virus issues, but their int”r/cybersecurity
Cybereason vs CYREBRO: common questions
Which is better, Cybereason or CYREBRO?
On our 0-100 score CYREBRO rates higher (61/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cybereason and CYREBRO compare on the numbers?
Cybereason leads on domain rating (76/100 against 50/100), headcount (676 against 143), funding raised ($934M against $66.0M), LinkedIn following (88,003 against 10,583). CYREBRO leads on our overall score (61/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (37/100 against 33/100), headcount growth (-15.9% against -20.0%).
What do real users say about Cybereason and CYREBRO?
Cybereason: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/cybersecurity.
Read the full Cybereason review and pricing or the CYREBRO review and pricing. You can also browse other Cybereason alternatives we track.