Cybear vs Hunters AI
Cybear vs Hunters AI, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cybear is on 49/100 and Hunters AI on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Cybear
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Hunters AI
- our overall score: 70/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 0/100
- headcount: 180 against 6
- funding raised: $118M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 25,421 against 362
At a glance
| Measure | Cybear | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Autonomous cybersecurity analyst for SOCs and MSSPs, revolutionizing threat detection and response. | AI-powered SOC platform automating threat detection, investigation, and response for security teams. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cybear | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6 | 180 |
| Total funding | $12.0M | $118M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 362 | 25,421 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cybear | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 44/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cybear | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Cybear vs Hunters AI: common questions
Which is better, Cybear or Hunters AI?
On our 0-100 score Hunters AI rates higher (70/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cybear and Hunters AI compare on the numbers?
Hunters AI leads on our overall score (70/100 against 49/100), domain rating (61/100 against 0/100), headcount (180 against 6), funding raised ($118M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (25,421 against 362).
Read the full Cybear review and pricing or the Hunters AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Cybear alternatives we track.