Cybaverse vs ThreatSpike
Cybaverse vs ThreatSpike, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cybaverse is on 39/100 and ThreatSpike on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Cybaverse
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 21/100
ThreatSpike
- our overall score: 47/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 47/100 against 35/100
- funding raised: $14.0M against $7.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Cybaverse | ThreatSpike |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered cybersecurity platform simplifying security for SMEs and MSPs. | AI-powered threat intelligence and cybersecurity platform for proactive defense. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, SaaS, AI-driven Security, Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP) | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, AI-driven Security, Vulnerability Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Portsmouth, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cybaverse | ThreatSpike |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 47 | Not published |
| Total funding | $7.5M | $14.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,580 | 8,218 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cybaverse | ThreatSpike |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 36/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 22/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 35/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cybaverse | ThreatSpike |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Cybaverse vs ThreatSpike: common questions
Which is better, Cybaverse or ThreatSpike?
On our 0-100 score ThreatSpike rates higher (47/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cybaverse and ThreatSpike compare on the numbers?
Cybaverse leads on agent readiness (44/100 against 21/100). ThreatSpike leads on our overall score (47/100 against 39/100), domain rating (47/100 against 35/100), funding raised ($14.0M against $7.5M).
Read the full Cybaverse review and pricing or the ThreatSpike review and pricing. You can also browse other Cybaverse alternatives we track.