Cybaverse vs RunSybil
Cybaverse vs RunSybil, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cybaverse is on 39/100 and RunSybil on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Cybaverse
- headcount: 47 against 28
- LinkedIn following: 7,580 against 2,720
RunSybil
- our overall score: 55/100 against 39/100
- funding raised: $40.0M against $7.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Cybaverse | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered cybersecurity platform simplifying security for SMEs and MSPs. | RunSybil offers an AI-driven pentester that automates hacker intuition to find vulnerabilities, aiming to drive down the speed and cost of vulnerability discovery to zero. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, SaaS, AI-driven Security, Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP) | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Penetration Testing, AI-driven Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Portsmouth, United Kingdom | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cybaverse | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 47 | 28 |
| Total funding | $7.5M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Unknown |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,580 | 2,720 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cybaverse | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 53/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 44/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 35/100 | 32/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cybaverse | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cybaverse | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI-driven pentesting, Rapid onboarding, Attack replay, Test transparency, Integrations |
What users say
| Measure | Cybaverse | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 3 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads |
“RunSybil. discussion of the automated offensive security testing platform RunSybil (www.runsybil.com)”r/
Cybaverse vs RunSybil: common questions
Which is better, Cybaverse or RunSybil?
On our 0-100 score RunSybil rates higher (55/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cybaverse and RunSybil compare on the numbers?
Cybaverse leads on headcount (47 against 28), LinkedIn following (7,580 against 2,720). RunSybil leads on our overall score (55/100 against 39/100), funding raised ($40.0M against $7.5M).
What do real users say about Cybaverse and RunSybil?
RunSybil: 3 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full Cybaverse review and pricing or the RunSybil review and pricing. You can also browse other Cybaverse alternatives we track.